In December of this year, it will be 80 years since the release of Gone with the Wind.
Gone with the Wind is my favourite film. It is a masterpiece, the story is multifaceted, the acting was brilliant and it brought to life a period of history that has indeed, gone. Some may say, good riddance.
The film itself defies being pigeonholed. Is it a love story? Not really, for anyone who has bothered to sit through the whole film will know, it doesn’t work out that way at all. Is it a war film? Not really, although the American Civil War is a part of it. Is it about Slavery? Again, not really, although this is a thread that weaves through the plot. Really, this film is about survival in the face of adversity. It is also about selfishness versus selflessness.
I have always loved this film and yet I have learned something new about the film that I think highlights inequalities in America at that time and also highlights how far we’ve come and yet how far we still have yet to go.
One of the most endearing characters in the film is Mammy, played by the brilliant Hattie McDaniel. Her performance was so good, she became the first African American to win an Oscar. However, she was not invited to attend the premiere of the film in Atlanta Georgia. Nor was she actually allowed to attend the Oscar event because it took place in a segregated ballroom. She had to wait at the back and when her name was announced she was allowed to collect her prize and make a speech. It was one of the most moving speeches ever given at the Oscars.
Another interesting this I have learned about this film is how much the main actors received in salary. It is quite enlightening.
The main character in the film is Scarlett O’Hara and indeed she appears in almost every scene, over an above every other performer. She was played by the English actress Vivien Leigh, who also won an Oscar for her performance.
She was paid in the region of $30,000 for her work. That may sound like a lot of money, and indeed it would have been back then when compared to the salary of a factory worker, but her co-star, Clark Gable received $117,000 as his salary, and it is that comparison that is so shocking.
Admittedly, Vivien Leigh was an unknown in Hollywood at that time compared to Clark Gable who was ‘the King’, but Olivia De Havilland wasn’t an unknown and her performance of Melanie Hamilton provided the heart against Scarlett’s animal survival instinct. It was a crucial role and she received just $25,000 for it.
In contrast, the actor who portrayed her husband, Ashley Wilkes, The English Actor Leslie Howard received $76,000.
You can see the pattern developing here. It certainly appears that Hollywood rated having a certain appendage above actual ability when it came to salaries.
To really drum home the inequality represented here. Ms McDaniel whose Oscar-winning performance remains my favourite in the film received just $6,780 as her salary.
We have come so far since then but still have so very far to go.
I hope one day we achieve true equality of gender and race and the only thing that is judged is our abilities and our achievements and never our sex, sexuality or the colour of our skin.
Thank you for reading.
https://wordofthedaychallenge.wordpress.com/2019/02/12/hope/
Wow, that’s enlightening, to say the least. Not to get political, but it really galls me when Hollywood types lecture the rest of us on all the things and it turns out they’re STILL discriminating and underpaying women etc.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Hollywood is the ultimate hypocrite, it likes to appear as a bastion of liberal values, but it is run like the most ruthless dictatorship. It has improved, but there is no room for complacency.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Isn’t it funny, that those and those places who clamor the most about inequality are the biggest offenders?
It makes me think that they wish to push the blame onto us, rather than fix their own issues first.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Distraction is a tool wielded by magicians, easier to distract than act.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Exactly Kristian.
LikeLiked by 1 person
It is a fantastic movie. I saw it twice. It’s more than four hours long. And the way women are treated and the salaries they received, things aren’t that difficult even after. 80 years.
LikeLiked by 1 person
It seemed that to be female and have dark skin meant that you got paid a great deal less. Things have improved but not enough.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Not enough, not by a long shot.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I love “Gone With The Wind”, and never knew all the history behind the actors. Thank you for sharing. 😊
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thank you for reading. It is amazing that Olivia De Havilland is still alive!
LikeLiked by 1 person
I am truly shocked at that. She must resemble Yoda now. (I know, I know… that was rude). LOL!
LikeLiked by 1 person
She’s 102! Methings Yoda would still consider her a young Padawan 😉
LikeLiked by 1 person
😂 🤣
LikeLiked by 1 person
I believe Clark Gable wanted to skip the Oscars in protest to Hattie’s treatment, but she talked him into coming. Unbelievable that this occurred just 80 years ago. So we have made some progress. Let’s hope we are able to maintain it…on all fronts.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Yes, I heard that he was going to boycott the premiere in Atlanta too for that reason. I realise that I misspelt his name too! I’ve gone back and corrected that now. 🙂
LikeLiked by 1 person
And I think you are right.. it was the premiere in Atlanta he wanted to boycott.
LikeLiked by 1 person
🙂
LikeLike
Gender-wise: Back then, all across the employment board, it was assumed that a woman had a male (father or husband) to provide for her main needs. And if she was single, she didn’t need as much.
Whereas a man had to provide a home and necessities for a wife and family, so he needed a higher wage. He needed a job, whereas women were just earning for “extras.”
This mindset was why single women, widows and/or separated, exp with children, had a very hard time surviving economically.
Race and earnings-wise, poor Harriet really got the short on of the stick! I’ve read that in the 30’s, blacks were routinely laid off so whites could keep jobs and have an income.You’re right, a lot has changed for the better.
LikeLiked by 2 people
That explains it very well, it doesn’t excuse the situation, but it does help to understand the mindset behind it. Thank you. 🙂
LikeLiked by 1 person
Verrrrrrry interesting Kristian!
LikeLiked by 1 person
I’ve learned a lot about this film, but the salary discrepancies really shocked me. (I suppose I should have expected it, but I didn’t.)
LikeLiked by 1 person